Pictured above is a stock I am currently doing research on. This is a stock that my clients have previously owned. When I owned this stock before, all of the shares were liquidated above $200. And no, I never got the high price. Contrary to what the media or banks and brokers...or ahem..."wealth advisors" want you to believe, there are only two ways to make money in stocks. One way is to buy low and sell at a higher price and the second way is to sell high and buy-back at a lower price. That's it. There is no other way to make money in the stock market. Yes, you can make a few percent in dividends, but today that's not enough to live on. So good or bad, you also need capital gains.
Okay, back to our picture above. I've removed the name of this company for compliance reasons, but in reality, it doesn't matter. Let's assume, just for arguments sake, that the orange line represents a reasonable assessment of this businesses' fair value. With this assumption in place, we can begin to make some observations.
1. Business value really doesn't change that much from year to year. The black, price line, moves around much more than estimated value.
2. The stock price can wildly deviate from business value. This is why the right active management strategy can add a lot of value to a client's financial life. But it forces one to "think." Today, most investors and advisors favor "non-thinking" strategies.
3. Stocks can stay over-valued for long periods of time, but when conditions change, the "re-set" to fair value can occur very quickly. The reversion-to-the-mean process can be a very painful emotional lesson.
4. This might seem a bit contradictory, but "fair-value' is a bit meaningless in the sense that stock prices rarely stay at a "fair-value." Think of this more like an over-pass on a freeway. The "fair-value" estimate is something stocks tend to pass by rather than ride along.
There are more observations we could make, but I think you get the general idea. I'd like to close these comments with a brief discussion on price buffers or "margin of safety." I don't like to use the term "margin of safety" because it can lead people to think I'm something that I am not - which is some deep-value guy. The capital markets are much more complicated than to adhere to such a narrow perspective on price. Anyhoo, if you can again refer to the graphic above, you can observe there is a pretty big spread between today's reasonable assumption of business value and the current stock price. In this assessment of fair-value, there is a lot built in that can go wrong. I build in a lot of failure. Contrary to previous years when the stock price was well above fair-value, there isn't really much that can go wrong without disappointing investors. Right? I mean sliced bread has already been invented so that idea is out the window! To give someone the best chance to make money in stocks, I'd suggest giving yourself a big buffer. I always set a stop loss ( a predetermined price where I would sell my position), but I also look for stocks that trade with a big buffer. This is one of the reasons why I'm taking a look at this stock.
Cheers!
P. Franklin, Jr.
August 10th, 2017
All opinions and estimates included in this communication constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this report and are subject to change without notice. This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. This information is subject to change at any time, based on market and other conditions. Any forward looking statements are just opinions – not a statement of fact.
Investing may involve risk including loss of principal. Investment returns, particularly over shorter time periods are highly dependent on trends in the various investment markets. Past performance does not guarantee future results.